๐ Python Mistakes Everyone Makes ❌
Day 39: Ignoring GIL Assumptions
Python makes multithreading look easy — but under the hood, there’s a critical detail many developers overlook: the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL).
Ignoring it can lead to slower programs instead of faster ones.
❌ The Mistake
Using threads to speed up CPU-bound work.
import threadingdef work():total = 0for i in range(10_000_000):total += ithreads = [threading.Thread(target=work) for _ in range(4)]for t in threads:
t.start()
for t in threads: t.join()
This looks parallel — but it isn’t.
❌ Why This Fails
Python has a Global Interpreter Lock (GIL)
Only one thread executes Python bytecode at a time
CPU-bound tasks do not run in parallel
Threads add context-switching overhead
Performance can be worse than single-threaded code
๐ง What the GIL Really Means
Threads are great for I/O-bound tasks
Threads are bad for CPU-bound tasks
Multiple CPU cores ≠ parallel Python threads
The GIL protects memory safety, but limits CPU parallelism.
✅ The Correct Way
Use multiprocessing for CPU-bound work.
from multiprocessing import Pooldef work(n):total = 0for i in range(n):total += ireturn totalif __name__ == "__main__":with Pool(4) as p:
p.map(work, [10_000_000] * 4)
Why this works:
Each process has its own Python interpreter
No shared GIL
True parallel execution across CPU cores
๐ง When to Use What
| Task Type | Best Choice |
|---|---|
| I/O-bound (network, files) | threading, asyncio |
| CPU-bound (math, loops) | multiprocessing |
| Mixed workloads | Combine wisely |
๐ง Simple Rule to Remember
๐ Threads ≠ CPU parallelism in Python
๐ GIL blocks parallel bytecode execution
๐ Use multiprocessing for CPU-heavy tasks
๐ Final Takeaway
Threads won’t make CPU-heavy Python code faster.
Understanding the GIL helps you choose the right concurrency model — and avoid hidden performance traps.
Know the limits. Write smarter Python. ๐⚡
.png)

0 Comments:
Post a Comment