๐ Python Mistakes Everyone Makes ❌
Day 38: Blocking I/O in Async Programs
Async programming in Python is powerful—but only if you follow the rules.
One of the most common mistakes is using blocking I/O inside async code, which silently kills performance.
❌ The Mistake
Using a blocking function like time.sleep() inside an async function.
import time
import asyncio async def task():time.sleep(2) # ❌ blocks the event loopprint("Done")
asyncio.run(task())
At first glance, this looks fine.
But under the hood, it breaks how async works.
❌ Why This Fails
time.sleep() blocks the event loop
While sleeping, no other async tasks can run
Async code becomes slow and sequential
No error is raised — just poor performance
This makes the bug easy to miss and hard to debug.
๐จ What’s Really Happening
Async programs rely on an event loop to switch between tasks efficiently.
Blocking calls stop the event loop entirely.
Result:
No concurrency
Wasted async benefits
Performance similar to synchronous code
✅ The Correct Way
Use non-blocking async alternatives like asyncio.sleep().
import asyncioasync def task():await asyncio.sleep(2)print("Done")
asyncio.run(task())
Why this works:
await pauses only the current task
The event loop stays responsive
Other async tasks can run in the meantime
๐ง Common Blocking Functions to Avoid in Async Code
- time.sleep()
Blocking file I/O
Blocking network calls
CPU-heavy computations
Use:
- asyncio.sleep()
Async libraries (aiohttp, aiofiles)
Executors for CPU-heavy work
๐ง Simple Rule to Remember
๐ Blocking calls freeze the event loop
๐ Use await, not blocking functions
๐ Never block the event loop in async code
๐ Final Takeaway
Async code only works when everything cooperates.
One blocking call can ruin your entire async design.
Write async code the async way —
Fast, non-blocking, and scalable.
.png)

0 Comments:
Post a Comment